Vaccine schedule for children Q&A
What is the MMR Vaccine schedule for young children who are not yet in school and/or getting ready to start School?
Q&A with Dr. Margaret Quinn, pediatric nurse practitioner and nursing professor at the Rutgers School of Nursing in New Jersey.
Q: How might the new Executive Order impact back-to-school checkups or vaccination protocols in New Jersey, New York and Connecticut?
A: The August 10, 2026 Executive Order recommends eventually administering measles, mumps and rubella as three separate vaccines once those individual products become domestically available. It also encourages giving childhood vaccines at separate medical visits when feasible and encourages states to reconsider their immunization requirements. It does not, by itself, repeal state school vaccination requirements.
There is an immediate practical issue: a single-antigen measles vaccine is not currently available in the United States. We currently protect children against measles through combination MMR (or MMRV) products.
Q. Do you anticipate health insurance vaccination coverage gaps or other potential problems?
A: I do not expect families to suddenly lose coverage for the MMR vaccine because of this Executive Order. In fact, the Administration's May 2026 Executive Order specifically stated that vaccines appearing in any category of the ACIP/CDC schedule should continue to be covered without cost sharing through private insurance and through programs such as Medicaid, CHIP and Vaccines for Children. Federal preventive-service law has also traditionally tied no-cost vaccine coverage to ACIP recommendations.
My greater concern is fragmentation and confusion. If we move from one MMR injection to three separate products given at separate visits, we increase the number of appointments, the number of injections and the chances that a child will not complete the series.
The need for more visits does not necessarily mean better healthcare. Instead, it can create practical barriers for working parents, families with transportation difficulties and families who already have limited access to primary care.
Even if the vaccine itself is covered, there can still be a compliance problem.
Q. What is your worst-case scenario or fear? What is the best-case scenario?
A: My worst-case scenario is fairly simple: vaccination rates fall, and more children get sick and die from measles.
If parents delay vaccines, separate vaccines over multiple visits or decide not to complete a series, we will create larger pockets of susceptible children. With a disease as contagious as measles, it does not take much for an imported case to become an outbreak. Asking a parent to accept three separate injections instead of one combination vaccine creates another opportunity for delay, refusal, or a missed dose.
Those who pay the highest price may not be the children whose parents declined vaccination. It may be the 6-month-old infant who is too young for routine MMR, the child being treated for cancer, or the pregnant woman who is exposed to rubella.
My best-case scenario is that this national discussion encourages parents to ask questions and have meaningful conversations with trusted pediatric healthcare providers—and that those conversations reinforce how safe and effective vaccination has been.
Parents should ask questions. Our responsibility as healthcare providers is to answer those questions using good science, good communication and respect.
Q. Any closing thoughts, particularly for residents of New Jersey, New York and Connecticut?
A: My message to parents would be: do not panic, and do not abandon the vaccination schedule because the political conversation surrounding vaccines is under discussion.
Vaccines are one of the reasons today's parents have rarely seen children with measles encephalitis, congenital rubella syndrome, polio or many of the other diseases that previous generations feared.
In New Jersey, New York and Connecticut, families should continue to work with their pediatric healthcare provider, maintain their child's immunization record and make sure children are appropriately vaccinated before school begins.
The goal should be to make vaccination easier, more accessible, and more understandable for families—not to add injections and additional visits
The science behind MMR has not suddenly changed. The vaccine remains highly effective, the combination vaccine has decades of safety data, and two doses provide approximately 97% protection against measles.
Vaccination policy should be driven by evidence, safety, effectiveness, and what actually helps families complete the recommended immunization schedule.
As a primary care provider and educator, my goal remains the same: prevent disease before I ever have to treat it.
This Q&A has been edited for length and clarity.
Medical Disclaimer
All content available on and through Health Nation Media is for informational purposes only. Such content is not an endorsement of, or a substitute for, nor does it replace, professional medical or veterinary advice, diagnosis, or treatment. If you have any concerns or questions about your or others' health or the content available on or through Health Nation Media, consult with a healthcare professional. Do not disregard, avoid, or delay obtaining health-related advice from a healthcare professional because of content available on or through Health Nation Media. Use of Health Nation Media and reliance on any Health Nation Media information is solely at your own risk. For more details, see Health Nation Media's Terms of Use.